Puppy Wireless Spy Camera

by Tiago

Puppy Wireless Spy Camera

There are a couple of ways to spy on other people, and one of the best is to use a spy camera. Needless to say, the camera in questions must not bring a lot of attention to itself, otherwise the spying plan goes down the toilet, and you will need to get another way to work as an undercover agent.

With that being said, the Puppy Wireless Spy Camera, which is a recent addition at Brando, looks like the gadget that can get the job done.

In case you are wondering, the camera is located on the nose, and unlike what happens with other low-quality spy cams, the Puppy is able to transmit both video and audio, without the need of wires because of the 2.4GHz frequency.

Having small dimensions – 7.5 x 12.5 x 2.4 cm – and a lightweight factor of 182g also helps to achieve the spying sessions. In the end, you can check the video content in 2 different systems: PAL with a resolution of 628×582, or NTSC that has a smaller 510×492 resolution.

The Puppy Wireless Spy Camera isn’t cheap, it costs $150 and the whole package includes the camera itself (with microphone), plus a receiver with Li-battery, plus 2 adaptors for the camera and for the receiver, the usual manual, and last but not least, an AV cable.

Product Page

Guest post by Tiago of Gadgetizer

6 reviews or comments

dx Says: January 16, 2008 at 9:32 pm

Why would someone need this? Only reason i could think of is for perverts to give to a hot girl and watch them in their room… or for twisted little kids to spy on their sisters (or brothers now days)

Picasso Says: January 16, 2008 at 10:30 pm

It’s obvious where the cam was before I even read of the location. Anyone can figure this out with a little common sense. Not a very good “undercover” spy cam in my opinion.

Picasso Says: January 16, 2008 at 10:33 pm

Maybe if the cam was in the eye and make both eyes appear the same, nobody would know it’s actually a spy cam in one eye, but the nose and a RED lense- gee wonder what that is huh? LOL! I wouldn’t pay $10 for this poorly developed “spy” cam.

Tiago Says: January 20, 2008 at 5:10 pm

@dx, do you really think the only reason for spy cams is check “hot girls”? Really?!?!

@Picasso, for some people it might be obvious where the camera is located, but I think “naive” people wouldn’t notice. Says: February 29, 2008 at 10:57 pm

Ever heard of Alex Rider?
its definetly good for undercover

Write a review or comment

You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Top Categories
Latest Posts
Subscribe to Newsletter